Print

Print


Hello Int-Law friends,

 

Please excuse what is probably a relatively basic question; I am still somewhat new at this!

 

I have pulled all of our foreign language dictionaries, both law-specific and common, out of the collection, and am looking them over for the purpose of weeding.  I am inclined to discard most of the non-current dictionaries, but I was wondering if anyone had any thoughts on the value of keeping older ones in the collection?  I imagine the answer could differ for legal dictionaries, as opposed to common foreign language dictionaries, as well.

 

As a history nerd, I like the idea of keeping some of the older ones; however, with regard to our faculty and students, I am not sure whether it would be useful.  I look forward to hearing your thoughts!

 

Thanks as always,

Susan Gualtier, JD, MLIS

Foreign, Comparative, and

International Law Librarian

Louisiana State University

Paul M. Hebert Law Center

1 E Campus Dr.

Baton Rouge, LA 70803

225-578-4028

[log in to unmask]

 

******************************************************************* Int-Law - International Law Librarians List: Post messages to [log in to unmask] To unsubscribe send a message with unsubscribe int-law as the text of the message to [log in to unmask] An archive of postings are located at http://listserver.ciesin.columbia.edu/int-law.html. **DISCLAIMER: The opinions expressed on this list are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of CIESIN, its staff, or CIESIN's sponsors.